ATOMIC(9)

NAME
atomic_add, atomic_clear, atomic_cmpset, atomic_fetchadd, atomic_load, atomic_readandclear, atomic_set, atomic_subtract, atomic_store - atomic operations

SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <machine/atomic.h>
void
atomic_add_[acq_|rel_]<type>(volatile <type> *p, <type> v);
void
atomic_clear_[acq_|rel_]<type>(volatile <type> *p, <type> v);
int
atomic_cmpset_[acq_|rel_]<type>(volatile <type> *dst, <type> old, <type> new);
<type>
atomic_fetchadd_<type>(volatile <type> *p, <type> v);
<type>
atomic_load_[acq_]<type>(volatile <type> *p);
<type>
atomic_readandclear_<type>(volatile <type> *p);
void
atomic_set_[acq_|rel_]<type>(volatile <type> *p, <type> v);
void
atomic_subtract_[acq_|rel_]<type>(volatile <type> *p, <type> v);
void
atomic_store_[rel_]<type>(volatile <type> *p, <type> v);

DESCRIPTION
Each of the atomic operations is guaranteed to be atomic in the presence of interrupts. They can be used to implement reference counts or as building blocks for more advanced synchronization primitives, such as mutexes.

On all architectures supported by DragonFly, ordinary loads and stores of integers in cache-coherent memory are inherently atomic if the integer is naturally aligned and its size does not exceed the processor's word size. However, such loads and stores may be elided from the program by the compiler, whereas atomic operations are always performed.

Except as noted below, the semantics of these operations are almost identical to the semantics of similarly named C11 atomic operations.

  Types
Each atomic operation operates on a specific type. The type to use is indicated in the function name. In contrast to C11 atomic operations, DragonFly's atomic operations are performed on ordinary integer types. The available types are:

cpumask
    CPU mask (cpumask_t)
int unsigned integer
long
    unsigned long integer
ptr unsigned integer the size of a pointer
32  unsigned 32-bit integer
64  unsigned 64-bit integer

For example, the function to atomically add two integers is called atomic_add_int().

Certain architectures also provide operations for types smaller than “int”.

char
    unsigned character
short
    unsigned short integer
8   unsigned 8-bit integer
16  unsigned 16-bit integer

These must not be used in machine-independent code, because the instructions to implement them efficiently may not be available.

  Memory Barriers
Memory barriers are used to guarantee the order of data accesses in two ways. First, they specify hints to the compiler to not re-order or optimize the operations. Second, on architectures that do not guarantee ordered data accesses, special instructions or special variants of instructions are used to indicate to the processor that data accesses need to occur in a certain order. As a result, most of the atomic operations have three variants in order to include optional memory barriers. The first form just performs the operation without any explicit barriers. The second form uses a read memory barrier, and the third variant uses a write memory barrier.

The second variant of each operation includes a read memory barrier. This barrier ensures that the effects of this operation are completed before the effects of any later data accesses. As a result, the operation is said to have acquire semantics as it acquires a pseudo-lock requiring further operations to wait until it has completed. To denote this, the suffix “_acq” is inserted into the function name immediately prior to the “_<type>” suffix. For example, to subtract two integers ensuring that any later writes will happen after the subtraction is performed, use atomic_subtract_acq_int().

The third variant of each operation includes a write memory barrier. This ensures that all effects of all previous data accesses are completed before this operation takes place. As a result, the operation is said to have release semantics as it releases any pending data accesses to be completed before its operation is performed. To denote this, the suffix “_rel” is inserted into the function name immediately prior to the “_<type>” suffix. For example, to add two long integers ensuring that all previous writes will happen first, use atomic_add_rel_long().

A practical example of using memory barriers is to ensure that data accesses that are protected by a lock are all performed while the lock is held. To achieve this, one would use a read barrier when acquiring the lock to guarantee that the lock is held before any protected operations are performed. Finally, one would use a write barrier when releasing the lock to ensure that all of the protected operations are completed before the lock is released.

  Multiple Processors
The current set of atomic operations do not necessarily guarantee atomicity across multiple processors. To guarantee atomicity across processors, not only does the individual operation need to be atomic on the processor performing the operation, but the result of the operation needs to be pushed out to stable storage and the caches of all other processors on the system need to invalidate any cache lines that include the affected memory region.

  Semantics
This section describes the semantics of each operation using a C like notation.

atomic_add(p, v)
        *p += v;

The atomic_add() functions are not implemented for the type “cpumask”.

atomic_clear(p, v)
        *p &= ~v;

atomic_cmpset(dst, old, new)
        if (*dst == old) {
        	*dst = new;
        	return 1;
        } else {
        	return 0;
        }

The atomic_cmpset() functions are not implemented for the types “char”, “short”, “8”, and “16”.

atomic_fetchadd(p, v)
        tmp = *p;
        *p += v;
        return tmp;

The atomic_fetchadd() functions are only implemented for the types “int”, “long” and “32” and do not have any variants with memory barriers at this time.

atomic_load(addr)
        return (*addr)

atomic_readandclear(addr)
        temp = *addr;
        *addr = 0;
        return (temp);

The atomic_readandclear() functions are not implemented for the types “char”, “short”, “ptr”, “8”, “16”, and “cpumask” and do not have any variants with memory barriers at this time.

atomic_set(p, v)
        *p |= v;

atomic_subtract(p, v)
        *p -= v;

The atomic_subtract() functions are not implemented for the type “cpumask”.

atomic_store(p, v)
        *p = v;

RETURN VALUES
The atomic_cmpset() function returns the result of the compare operation. The atomic_fetchadd(), atomic_load(), and atomic_readandclear() functions return the value at the specified address.

HISTORY
The atomic_add(), atomic_clear(), atomic_set(), and atomic_subtract() operations were first introduced in FreeBSD 3.0. This first set only supported the types “char”, “short”, “int”, and “long”.

The atomic_cmpset(), atomic_load(), atomic_readandclear(), and atomic_store() operations were added in FreeBSD 5.0. The types “8”, “16”, “32”, “64”, and “ptr” and all of the acquire and release variants were added in FreeBSD 5.0 as well.

The atomic_fetchadd() operations were added in FreeBSD 6.0.

The relaxed variants of atomic_load() and atomic_store() were added in FreeBSD 12.0 and DragonFly 6.5.